Paper 1 Strategy
2 hours · MC 22% + Section B 33% · Compulsory part only.
Time allocation
| Section | Marks (approx.) | Suggested time |
|---|---|---|
| Section A (MC) | 36 × 1 = 36 | 30–40 minutes |
| Section B (short + structured) | ~55 | 70–80 minutes |
| Review | — | 10 minutes |
If you finish Section A in 20 min, don't immediately move to B — use 10 min to re-check your MC answers. MC mistakes are the cheapest marks to recover.
Section A · Multiple Choice
Process for each question
- Cover the choices, predict the answer mentally.
- Uncover and pick the closest match.
- If not sure, eliminate at least 2 wrong options.
- Move on. Don't agonise over one MC for 3 minutes.
- Mark uncertain ones (e.g. circle the number) and revisit after Section B if time allows.
Common MC trap patterns
| Trap | Example |
|---|---|
| Almost-right answer | "What does TCP do?" — A) Routes packets (that's IP) B) Provides reliable delivery (correct) |
| Negated question | "Which is NOT a benefit of normalisation?" — students miss the NOT |
| Unit mismatch | "1 KB =" — 1024 bytes (NOT 1000 bytes) |
| Mixed scope | Question describes a LAN but options compare WAN features |
Section B · Short and Structured Questions
Anatomy of a structured question
A typical structured question chains 4–6 sub-questions:
Q4. Context paragraph about a school library system.
(a) Define X. [2]
(b) Identify two attributes of Y. [2]
(c) Write a pseudocode for Z. [4]
(d) Evaluate the design with respect to W. [4]2
3
4
5
Treat each sub-question as a mini-essay. Re-read the context only when a sub-question references it.
Answer length by mark count
| Marks | Typical answer length |
|---|---|
| 1 | A short phrase or single fact |
| 2 | Two facts OR one fact + one example |
| 3–4 | A structured paragraph with definition + example |
| 5–6 | Multi-paragraph with diagram + comparison |
Command verbs to take seriously
| Verb | Expected response |
|---|---|
| State / List | Brief facts, no explanation |
| Describe | Sentence-level explanation |
| Explain | Why / how, with cause-effect |
| Compare | Two-sided table or paragraph |
| Evaluate | Strengths AND weaknesses, then a conclusion |
| Design | Plan + reasoning (e.g. ER diagram + justification) |
Mini templates
"Explain why X happens"
X happens because <cause>. This is because <mechanism>. As a result, <effect>. For example, <concrete instance>.
"Compare A and B"
A is <short description> while B is <short description>. In terms of <criterion 1>, A <…> whereas B <…>. In terms of <criterion 2>, A <…> whereas B <…>. Therefore A is more suitable for <scenario>.
Pseudocode answer
Always use HKEAA-style:
INPUT n
total ← 0
FOR i ← 1 TO n
total ← total + i
END FOR
OUTPUT total2
3
4
5
6
Use ← for assignment, not =. Use END FOR, END IF to close blocks.
Reference materials provided in the paper
- SQL command list (the same one printed in Paper 2A)
- Common spreadsheet functions
Familiarise yourself with the layout so you don't waste time hunting on the day.
Bonus tips
- Number-base conversions appear nearly every year — drill until they take <30 sec.
- Section A often has 1 question on two's complement — practise the 3-step method.
- Section B often has 1 question requiring you to trace pseudocode — practise with a trace table.
➡️ Next: Paper 2 strategy